December 2, 2012
Dear Mr. President:
Ultimately education is an opportunity for success.
For some it is simply an opportunity to realize their goals and achieve
happiness. For many it is an opportunity for them to climb out of poverty, and
achieve the American dream. I believe this opportunity should be the same for
all students in the United States, but unfortunately it isn’t. Not all students
receive an equal opportunity for education, poor children, minorities, and
immigrants happen to get the worst education. These students typically live in
low income areas and urban environments. The schools in these neighborhoods get
a fraction of the education funding being given to schools in suburban, high
income, areas where the students and their families tend to be more educated
and have access to resources (3). The success of a student is based on many
factors, not just their schools funding. Other factors include poverty of the
students, and the quality of the teachers also has a major effect on the
quality of education children receive. So why would we burden those students
further with insufficient funding? My parents came out of poverty through
education. Through their experiences I have come to learn the importance of
education and understand how difficult it is for someone in poverty to succeed
in school. Policy regarding funding for urban schools need to be improved, funding
for urban schools must be greatly increased so the students in these schools
can have the same opportunity to succeed as any other student, in any other
school.
In urban areas, where schools get the least funding,
there is a large population of lower class, and migrant students. The American
Psychological Association refers to someone who is a part of the lower class
status as someone with low Socioeconomic Status or low SES (1). Students with
low SES are automatically at a disadvantage when it comes to education. These
students tend to be a part of households where there may be low literacy,
chronic stress, and the parents may not have the time availability to provide
the type of support conducive to their child’s learning(1). A study of American
kindergarten students showed that that 36% of low SES parents read to their
kids daily, versus 62% of high SES families (1). A student’s initial reading competence is
directly related to the literacy environment of their home, parents stress, and
how many books they own (1). All of these factors influence a student’s
preacademic skills (1). When students enter into a school environment they may
have a lack of academic confidence due to inadequate preparation for the school
environment (2). These students tend to acquire language skills more slowly;
they may have delayed letter recognition, delayed phonological awareness, which
result in difficulties with reading; they may have issues with addition,
subtraction, and word problems (1). There is a strong link between students
that come from low SES environments and learning disabilities. These children
are twice as likely to show behavioral problems as well (1).
These issues associated with children from low SES
environments occur at no fault from the children themselves. Lee Warren is
Associate Director of the Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning at Harvard
University wrote about low SES students in her essay called Class in the Classroom she said “working
class students are keenly aware of the value of higher education, tend to be
highly motivated, and know how to work hard. They are often characterized by
fierce determination and goal-orientation. They have strong work ethic and
often manage hair-raising schedules of work, family, and college, pulling off
the demands of each with grit and clear sense of purpose” (2). Students from
low SES backgrounds need extra support, from their schools and teachers, to
help them rise above the challenges they face. That’s why the urban schools, in
poor neighborhoods, that low SES students are more heavily enrolled in should
be funded more, if not at least the same, as the schools in suburban, more
affluent neighborhoods.
In urban schools the lack of sufficient funding causes
the students in these schooled to be trained by overworked, underpaid, and
often times unqualified teachers to teach in overcrowded classrooms with
insufficient supplies. A teacher in an urban school gets paid 20% less than
teachers in suburban schools (3). Teachers in urban areas also face a higher
cost of living. The difficulties of working in these schools cause most
teachers to leave their profession within years. As a result urban schools
constantly have new teachers coming in that face a variety of challenges.
Since many of the students need extra support because
of their socioeconomic background these teachers are forced to offer extra
support for many students in overcrowded classes. New teachers face stress,
fatigue and aren’t given the necessary emotional support to cope with it. This
is why new teachers are unwilling to teach in urban schools because they fear
the environment and the challenges they will face. They fear having to deal
with run-down classrooms, outdated textbooks, and insufficient classroom
equipment. Often times good teachers that are in these schools will simply move
to a different school district where they will get paid more, and face less
difficulty (3). It is a fact that because of insufficient funding that
minority, and low SES students are more likely to be taught by an under-qualified
teacher (3). Quality teachers have the greatest impact on improving a student’s
performance; there should be more of them in urban schools, where they should
get paid more, not less, for their extremely hard work.
Schools in urban, poor neighborhoods need to get the
funding that they so desperately require so that the students within these
schools have the same opportunities to succeed as any other student in any
other school. It is essential for the success of these students, and for the
continued prosperity of this nation.